The Pentagon Is Building an Autonomous Arsenal. It Doesn’t Have Autonomous Command.

Ken Hampshire: In July, the Department of War reorganized unmanned and autonomous systems under a Direct Reporting Portfolio Manager (DRPM-UxS), consolidating disparate autonomy programs into a single authority with the mandate to adopt emerging capabilities across the joint force. The Pentagon is usually precise about what it needs. Many requirements describe a layer of technology that can translate commander’s intent into machine execution, side by side with humans on or in the loop. That layer is orchestration. It is the ability to project human intent horizontally across vertical autonomy stacks and to carry out that intent automatically. Think of it as autonomous mission command for robotic forces. Yet the term “orchestrator” is variously interpreted and inconsistently used, making it difficult to build one.
Ken Hampshire: In July, the Department of War reorganized unmanned and autonomous systems under a Direct Reporting Portfolio Manager (DRPM-UxS), consolidating disparate autonomy programs into a single authority with the mandate to adopt emerging capabilities across the joint force. The Pentagon is usually precise about what it needs. Many requirements describe a layer of technology that can translate commander’s intent into machine execution, side by side with humans on or in the loop. That layer is orchestration. It is the ability to project human intent horizontally across vertical autonomy stacks and to carry out that intent automatically. Think of it as autonomous mission command for robotic forces. Yet the term “orchestrator” is variously interpreted and inconsistently used, making it difficult to build one.
Ken Hampshire: In July, the Department of War reorganized unmanned and autonomous systems under a Direct Reporting Portfolio Manager (DRPM-UxS), consolidating disparate autonomy programs into a single authority with the mandate to adopt emerging capabilities across the joint force. The Pentagon is usually precise about what it needs. Many requirements describe a layer of technology that can translate commander’s intent into machine execution, side by side with humans on or in the loop. That layer is orchestration. It is the ability to project human intent horizontally across vertical autonomy stacks and to carry out that intent automatically. Think of it as autonomous mission command for robotic forces. Yet the term “orchestrator” is variously interpreted and inconsistently used, making it difficult to build one.

ABOUT NODA AI

NODA AI is a defense technology company headquartered in Austin, Texas, delivering Mission Command for Autonomous Forces. NODA’s Software-Defined Effects (SDFX) engine projects and maintains commander’s intent across heterogeneous unmanned systems in contested, multi-domain environments, transforming fleets that are merely coordinated into a decisive force that executes a human intent across any vendor, any domain. NODA brings the largest network of integrated government and OEM platforms spanning every physical domain from subsurface to the stratosphere, including LUCAS, the Department of War’s attritable unmanned strike system, providing unified intent to any mixed-vendor, multi-domain fleet with no hardware onboard and no changes required from the manufacturer. Founded by Marine Corps veterans and AI practitioners, NODA’s mission is to make mission command for autonomous forces the decisive advantage for the warfighter.

For more information, visit: https://nodaintelligence.ai/  

MEDIA CONTACT

Scott Stanford
VP of Brand Marketing and Communications